New: Start your fundraiser in 3 minutes

Germany Causes
< 2% of Global CO2

Surreal illustration: the Brandenburg Gate rising from an endless desert of sand dunes under a glaring sun

Germany is responsible for less than 2% of global greenhouse gas emissions, so even truly ambitious German climate policy would not help…

X post by Friedrich Merz: “Some believe we can simply turn the system upside down for the #climate, yet Germany's share of global #CO2 emissions is only 2%.” View the post

Many decision-makers have argued along these or similar lines in recent years, not least the future German Chancellor Friedrich Merz. By now I find it difficult to keep a cool head when I hear this “argument” and generally assume that people are not interested in gaining knowledge or even solving problems, but only in scoring points in the debate.

But for those who are really taking this serious, here are five reasons why a country’s current CO2 greenhouse gas emissions should not really be relevant to its climate policy.

1. per capita instead of per country

Of course, it doesn’t make sense to focus on the emissions of an entire country when it comes to deciding who is responsible. Instead, we should look at CO2 emissions per capita, and here Germany, Austria and Switzerland are not only ahead of China, but also more than 100% above the global average.

Line chart: consumption-based CO2 emissions per capita, 1990–2022, well above 10 tonnes for Switzerland, Germany and Austria, and rising but below 8 tonnes for China
2. consumption instead of production

Many emissions are caused by imported products. In Germany and Austria, the consumption-based COâ‚‚ emissions are around 40% higher than the officially reported figures. In Switzerland, they are more than 270% higher. What matters is what we consume, not just what we produce.

3. historical instead of current emissions

It seems extremely unfair to focus solely on current emissions instead of the historical total, since our prosperity was not created in the past year alone but is significantly based on industrial development over the last 200 years. According to this metric, Germany already accounts for more than 5% of global emissions.

4. achieving targets instead of playing the blame game

Even if the two largest emitters - China and the USA - were to stop emitting greenhouse gases altogether, we would not even be halfway to achieving the goal of reducing global CO2 emissions to zero. Everyone has to joins in, otherwise it cannot work, so even small countries cannot shrug off their responsibility.

5. ambitions instead of excuses

Instead of lamenting how much or how little Germany contributes to climate change, we should rather think about how we can achieve more. In doing so, we should not look too much inwards, but consider what measures could help to reduce global CO2 emissions. One approach would be to help new climate technologies achieve a breakthrough, which can then be rolled out worldwide. This is exactly what we have already done once, namely with the solar industry, as Ramez Naam impressively explains in this video:

By the way, this last point makes sense not only for countries but also for each of us personally. Instead of limiting ourselves to trying to offset our own CO₂ emissions, we should consider how to take ambitious action for global climate protection. In addition to personal behavioral changes, effective donations can be a powerful lever for climate action—especially when used to make essential climate technologies scalable and competitive. That’s exactly what the top climate organizations we recommend are working on.

About the author

Avatar of Sebastian Schwiecker

Founder & Managing Director

More blog posts